South32 President Suing Australian BHP mining BHP.com $800,000,000,000.00 Billion Dollars | South32 - Lawyers | Articles - Lawyers - Press Releases Archives - ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION South32 Limited v. South32, South32 is a trademarked film company Case No. D2023-1808 1. The Parties The Complainant is South32 Limited, Australia, represented by Griffith Hack Lawyers, Australia. The Respondent is South32, South32 is a trademarked film company, United States of America (“United States”). 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with Sea Wasp, LLC (the “Registrar”). 3. Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center (the “Center”) on April 24, 2023. On April 24, 2023, the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a request for registrar verification in connection with the disputed domain name. On April 28, 2023, the Registrar transmitted by email to the Center its verification response disclosing registrant and contact information for the disputed domain name which differed from the named Respondent (Jewella Privacy – 29338, Jewella Privacy LLC Privacy ID# 1228614) and contact information in the Complaint. The Center sent an email communication to the Complainant on May 1, 2023 providing the registrant and contact information disclosed by the Registrar, and inviting the Complainant to submit an amendment to the Complaint. The Complainant filed an amended Complaint on May 11, 2023. The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”). In accordance with the Rules, paragraphs 2 and 4, the Center formally notified the Respondent of the Complaint, and the proceedings commenced on May 15, 2023. In accordance with the Rules, paragraph 5, the due date for Response was June 4, 2023. The Response was filed with the Center on May 20, 2023. The Center appointed Andrew D. S. Lothian, Nicholas Smith, and Mohamed-Hossam Loutfi as panelists in this matter on June 15, 2023. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. Each member of the Panel has submitted the Statement of Acceptance and Declaration of Impartiality and Independence, as required by the Center to ensure compliance with the Rules, paragraph 7. 7. Decision For the foregoing reasons, the Complaint is denied.

South32 lawyers Suing Australian BUSTED BHP BHP.com $800,000,000,000.00 Billion Dollars | South32 - Lawyers | Articles - Lawyers - Press Releases Archives.

E-mail

E-mail

E-mail

E-mail

E-mail

E-mail

E-mail

E-mail

South32 Dead production. E-mail

South32 Suing Australian BHP mining BHP.com $800,000,000,000.00 Billion Dollars | South32 - Lawyers | Articles - Lawyers - Press Releases Archives - ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION South32 Limited v. South32, South32 is a trademarked film company Case No. D2023-1808 1. The Parties The Complainant is South32 Limited, Australia, represented by Griffith Hack Lawyers, Australia. The Respondent is South32, South32 is a trademarked film company, United States of America (“United States”). 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with Sea Wasp, LLC (the “Registrar”). 3. Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center (the “Center”) on April 24, 2023. On April 24, 2023, the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a request for registrar verification in connection with the disputed domain name. On April 28, 2023, the Registrar transmitted by email to the Center its verification response disclosing registrant and contact information for the disputed domain name which differed from the named Respondent (Jewella Privacy – 29338, Jewella Privacy LLC Privacy ID# 1228614) and contact information in the Complaint. The Center sent an email communication to the Complainant on May 1, 2023 providing the registrant and contact information disclosed by the Registrar, and inviting the Complainant to submit an amendment to the Complaint. The Complainant filed an amended Complaint on May 11, 2023. The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”). In accordance with the Rules, paragraphs 2 and 4, the Center formally notified the Respondent of the Complaint, and the proceedings commenced on May 15, 2023. In accordance with the Rules, paragraph 5, the due date for Response was June 4, 2023. The Response was filed with the Center on May 20, 2023. The Center appointed Andrew D. S. Lothian, Nicholas Smith, and Mohamed-Hossam Loutfi as panelists in this matter on June 15, 2023. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. Each member of the Panel has submitted the Statement of Acceptance and Declaration of Impartiality and Independence, as required by the Center to ensure compliance with the Rules, paragraph 7. 7. Decision For the foregoing reasons, the Complaint is denied.

E-mail

E-mail

E-mail